Goodnews's Weblog

It is mostly about leadership, as is applied to self, teams, organisations and nation states


Leave a comment

The elusive dream of post-’94 SA

An article in the New York Times in 2012: Unfulfilled Promises Are Replacing The Prospects Of a Better Life For All

I cannot fault the article, neither can I fault the expectation for government & the ruling party to make it easier for the likes of Mr Sello, on one hand (to provide simple government support & zero tolerance for fraud and corruption, including dispensing patronage to close associates, friends and family), and, on the other, sophisticated government support that can, through shrewd public policy design (and implementation), thwart the organised looting of our resources by the multinationals through illicit revenue outflows. The vehicles for this corporate plunder are thin capitalisation and transfer pricing schemes.

If sophisticated leaders in corporate, as well as multi-billionaire investors across the world, fear change, how much more is it for the multitudes of voters beholden to the ANC, for the inches of positive changes that happened since 1994? – Human beings are not good at dealing with change, and we see this in simple family or romantic relationships that may not be serving us well, but we remain attached, nevertheless. Learned helplessness creeps in, and the guilty party, unfortunately understands this, and they carry on plundering with oblivion. In this case, the ANC and alliance leadership ‘know’ that our people do not know better, and they know that the middle class does not have the ‘balls’ to start a ‘new’ party to drive into the new vacuumed space. We are paralysed, and it will take more than one generation to wake up from the slumber, dust ourselves up and drive self-serving leaders out of power. Just recently, one of my friends was saying that as we grow older, we stop looking beyond our small family units, in the hope that our national challenges will sort themselves out. There are very few people who are prepared to take up the proverbial arms and build something new, for there is a lot at stake, including personal safety, in some parts of South Africa. The end to the current state of affairs is not near, for we do not have untainted, young and old leaders from which we can choose, to make a national turnaround. The interconnectedness of the political elite means that whomever we choose within that pool, we are not going to be able to break the cycle of downward spiral. Business leadership has a hand in this, for they are smiling all the way to the bank, whilst the country is burning, literally and figuratively. As Mintzberg says (Governing Management, Managing Government), it is the concert of private, public, non-governmental and co-op leadership that makes democracy go round… Sadly, with us, all are from the same pool of selfish and egoistic leaders (government, politics and business), save for a few from the NGO movement & Co-ops, who lack the resources and the courage to challenge the status quo.

We need business leadership that has the vision of what a democracy in South Africa would look like, and then go and do what is required in their businesses first, to stop the exclusion of skilled and patriotic leaders who want this economy to thrive. They have to ensure that they go beyond the myopic quarterly results to monitor and evaluate leadership efficacy and to top it all, they have to reach out the NGO sector, to finance programmes that will increase the level of socio-political education of the 49m. This is the bridge that will create the union between narrow business interests and the wider societal agenda of driving both formal and informal education needed to shift South Africa in the right direction. A few hundred of millions of Rands, usually spent in 5 year terms, in the months preceding elections, sponsoring political parties, can be diverted to finance the bridge between business and society, through credible social programs.

Political leadership seems to be a passenger in their own political vehicles, just like a driver of a vehicle that has experienced a partial head-on collision with another. The dislodgement of the wheel assembly from the steering column renders both driver and steering wheel, powerless. No amount of logic, finger-pointing, or political reports is going to stem the tide of the challenges in this space.

If South Africa is to be better off than the average African state, after liberation, under the current system of things, it has to look to civil society for the answers (I include business leadership), for these are the ones who have a lot to lose. Political leadership has attained its political power in 1994, including access to resources, and therefore is not motivated to drive societal transformation with the same pre ’94 vigour. Most of the business leaders in South Africa lack a balanced view of the world, and therefore a double-edged sword of a narrow spectrum of consciousness and short-sightedness, is most likely to hurt the very assets they are stewards of.

Business leaders are content with serving the short term needs of the political elite, at the expense of the long term needs of the wider society, members of which are currently disadvantaged as a result of them serving the short term needs of the political elite of the old regime. It is sad state of affairs because it shows that they have a very short memory of what brought the South African economy to its knees in the early ’90s. South Africa’s indigenous businesses and multinationals operating within our borders, in the SADC region and in the rest of Africa, are crying out for leaders who have done a lot of work on their being. Otto Scharmer describes this internal work as the quality of the intention and attention of their leadership practice. Most refuse to go there, for they are afraid of what they might just awake to, as C. Jung states: ““Your visions will become clear only when you can look into your own heart. Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes.”

A good example of business and political leaders that are in the same slumber, is in the United Kingdom, and the disastrous manner in which they handled Brexit saga. Lack of foresight and an inability to deal with the complex needs of a diverse society resulted in a tumble of the markets across the globe, massive currency loss of value, as well as deepening of societal divisions along many ‘isms’: age, class and more. It also cost the Prime Minister his job.

Back home, we have been stumbling from one crisis to another, most recently, Nenegate and Tshwane burning. That dream, that Madiba magic that held the nation together at times critical from 1990 onwards, is running on reserve fuel. We run the risk of further crises on all fronts, unless, as in the late 1980’s, business and civil society leadership wakes up by looking within and questioning the attention and intention of their leadership practices, as individuals and collectives, at home, in organisations and in different sectors. We know as a nation that political leaders (when in power) are usually the last to actually see and feel the trend, with recent examples when they have been unable to predict Nenegate, Tshwane, and thirdly, the bigger one: powers of the public protector Constitutional Court judgement.

To all C-Suite executives, I appeal to you, not because you are not Immune to the required Transformation in South Africa, but because you are. My appeal is further motivated by the fact that you are not uniquely blind to the obvious, but your counterparts up in the UK share the same blind spots, including the belief that politics is not your responsibility. Furthermore, it is my belief that you have skills and knowledge to deal with the challenges we face, including the resources to look right in there in your hearts for the reasons why you have mostly been quiet. It is your quietness and your continued support of political leadership, under the guise of supporting democracy, that contributes to the elusive dream of a post ’94 South Africa.

I appeal to you to give that monetary support (hundreds of millions of Rands) to the deserving NGO and Co-Op sector organisations, so that the post ’94 as mapped out in our Constitution, can become a reality.

Most of all, I remind you that it begins with you. It is values-based leadership that will transform your businesses and thereby give you the currency to speak truth to power, for you will have none of the ‘small(anyana) skeletons’ that could tumble out of your closets, when you become true to our Constitution.


Leave a comment

7 Reasons for Leadership Success on the Back of Courageous Authenticity

Courageous Authenticity

Courageous Authenticity

As part of the coaching service we provide to both individuals and teams at the top of organisations, we assess them before and after the coaching relationship that usually lasts for about two years at the most. The 360 degree assessment we use was developed by Bob Anderson, and can be accessed at www.theleadershipcircle.com and it can be used for all leadership levels, with the Manager Edition for functional managers. As the reference suggests (360), it is a measure of both self and others’ assessment of the leader. Among the competencies that we measure, Courageous Authenticity is one of the most revered by peers and followers alike. It is paired with Integrity to contribute to the composite element: Authenticity.

I have observed and listened to leaders, followers and peers alike, lamenting poor display of courageous authenticity by a leader who is a subject of evaluation. There are a number of ways in which a lack of courageous authenticity manifests itself in the leader, both within and externally. Most observers of these leaders highlight the following, as what they are looking for in the ideal leader:

  • The willingness, both in one-on-one engagements and in group meetings, to affix their proverbial flag to the mast, in support of a well-considered position.

o   When all has been considered, someone has to take the lead to ensure a decision is made and though it may not be the most popular, it should be the best, based on the intention or the desired outcomes. The choice may be policy-driven, or values-driven, and consistent with the desired system-outcome. Most leaders capitulate in the face of pressure (which may not necessarily be driven by what is best for all) and desire to be popular, thereby make the wrong choices when it matters most.

  • The courage to bring up the ‘undiscussables’ and break the cycle of a downward spiral that may be influenced by the fear to be seen to be going against the generally accepted norms. These norms, in all cases, bear no resemblance to the espoused values of the organisation the leader is serving.

o   There may be an issue that has crept into either a certain behaviour that is contrary to the adopted value system, or erratic decision-making that shows lack of focus, with most in the group or team, having accepted that as a norm. It is a leader with courage that will be able to break the cycle and get all to change and remember what the organisation is all about.

  • The leader must be more able to deal with relationships issues and be at ease with sharing their own vulnerabilities when dealing with others, whatever the situation.

o   Most leaders are not aware of what the much acclaimed coach in Marshall Goldsmith, wrote about in his book: “What Got You Here, Won’t Get You There”. Leaders come up the ranks to levels that require them to give up what they excelled in, because the new level at which they operate requires them to suddenly master a new set of competencies. One of the competencies that is required more of the leader, as they go up the ladder, is relationship management. It is the other side of the same coin: task achievement and it places a high demand on the leader to be more able to collaborate and influence others to change their views about deeply held beliefs. In South Africa (to a certain extent, globally) we have variables: race, gender, class and disability, playing a major role in the leader’s ability to deal with relationships. This certainly, as all stakeholders are more discerning in this regard, will make or break a leader’s career as their judgement is called upon to emerge as a critical differentiator of their prowess in leadership.

  • Courageous authenticity calls for leaders to be more able to deal with risky situations, authentically and directly, whatever the perceived danger.

o   Turning the tide, shifting levels of consciousness of both peers and bosses, changing the way business sustainability is seen within the system of capitalism as we know it, requires bold leaders like Nelson Mandela,  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,  Otto Scharmer, Michael Porter, Paul Polman, Bill George, Maya Angelou, and a few more, who are starting to share their own new-found beliefs. Not only have they seen current short-term business models as being unsustainable, they are doing (some did) something about it, and they are the evangelists of ‘new-think’. They are changing (some have changed) the way leaders see their role in solving intractable societal and business problems.

I have also heard from most of these leaders, justifying and defending their behaviour (being less courageous and authentic) in this regard. Some of what they say suggests that they find safety and comfort in the approval of others, whatever the intentions of group-think may be. This will certainly be detrimental to the achievement of the mission on which the incumbent leader accepted their role.

Now, what you have been waiting for, the 7 reasons why you ought to display courageous authenticity, for inner peace, task achievement, building a resilient culture and creating High Performance Teams, Organisations and Nations, are listed herein below:

  1. You will have inner peace that is not influenced by seeking validation by others for higher self-worth to register within. You will no longer be held hostage to others’ selfish judgment.
  2. Truth to self, others and to power will be the source of your leadership effectiveness. Leaders of high integrity achieve more out of their leadership life. They do not fear to push the boundaries.
  3. It will be easy for others to follow you for they can see by your own example, and it is easy for you to give feedback because your beliefs and the values of your organization come alive in consistent decisions and actions. They will trust you!
  4. “To live, to love, to learn, and to leave a legacy”, a la Stephen Covey ~ will be an easy journey for you, because you will have accepted the light and the dark side of self. It will be easy for you to receive and give negative feedback, whilst not filtering it, without breaking the other’s self-esteem.
  5. When your followers trust you, they will be more committed to achieving more. You will be the most successful leader in your chosen field. In situations where you have to exit the system due to incongruity of  values, it will be easy to get into another system or organization, for your reputation will have preceded you, as they say.
  6. There will be fewer ‘undiscussables’ in the organization or team that you serve, thereby making it difficult for people problems to fester and paralyse the creative ability of the team members. This will be so, as a result of the ‘nothing to hide, or hide from’ currency you will have created for self and others.
  7. Finally, it will be easier for you to negotiate difficult agreements that may otherwise have been clouded by your own inconsistency, or that of the rest of the people with whom you live and work.

In conclusion, I believe that for any leader to be able to display high levels of transformational leadership, which in simple terms, is the ability to perform difficult tasks (like cutting expenditure budgets extensively, or ramping up income revenue, or even negotiating tough changes in behavior, or values alignment, as well as even embarking on a new business venture), and make cause to happen for a big system to shift, they have to be authentic and courageous at the same time. Without courageous authenticity, no leader can change anything, even self. As the human race, we are doomed, literally, if we cannot develop courageous authenticity, at the crests of all human existence. Where leadership is a way of life, rather than a position, this demand is placed on both leaders and followers, equally.

In the next article, I will spend in-depth analysis of the twin to Courageous Authenticity (that is Integrity), as a driver of leadership success.


Leave a comment

Nelson Mandela’s Afro-Cuban dog

Nelson Mandela’s Afro-Cuban dog.

Thus it seems the Rhodesian Ridgeback was a fitting companion for Mandela who has dedicated his entire life to achieving equality among the people of South Africa and who credits Cuba’s military assistance in Angola as being the crucial factor in turning the tide against apartheid.


Leave a comment

Disciplined thoughts and actions, a la Collins

Disciplined thought begins with personal conviction of who I am, and what I represent as a leader, in relation to the organisation I serve, and its different parts, within the context of the environment it operates in. It is about my value system, my beliefs about self, others, and the world I live in. When I have packaged my thoughts in a particular way that covers most of the above, my level of consciousness as a leader is most likely to be higher than most.

For me, it is the level of consciousness as a leader that will, if shared and debated with peer leaders, begins th process of creating a shared meaning. It is this shared meaning that will give birth to a spiral that begins with the top team, and others in an organisation at all levels, that makes it so easy to have disciplined action across an organisation.

Most leaders always, without fail, go out to fix what they see to be ill-discplined action in any given part, or right across, without going deep to find out what the underlying assumptions of the actors, are. As soon as the ‘intervention’ wave is over, all the actors go back into their ‘old’ ways, and continue to act in the ‘discipline’ of self-preservation at an individual level, and silo-mentality at a part of the organisation level.

To create disciplined action, disciplined thought is where it all begins, and disciplined thought is usually driven by a shared meaning of what the future looks like. I would start by selling the picture of the future, and make a compelling case for certain assumptions that must hold in our headspaces as members of the extended organisation, for that future to realise. It goes without say then, that certain actions have to take place, driven by a personal need to achieve the gleam of a shared future… That is a beginning of an autonomic system of teams, business units, corporates, organisations, nation states, acting in concert towards global leadership campaigns like Climate Change, Elimination of Racism, Sexism, and other forms global issues humanity is failing to conquer.

On that list I would include the fundamental reason for existence for that particular organisation, viewed from an expanded view of the present: past, present & future. A sustainable view.

That, for me ushers in a new kind of (extended) organisation, with an autonomic nervous system that operates all the way from shareholders, boards, executive teams, employees, customers, and other stakeholders, for the benefit of the whole, with minimal bureaucracy, if only to serve the whole.